TIRE REVIEWS Tire Reviews by Product

Tire Size: 215/60-16
Tire Image
Yokohama AVID ENVigor

215/60-16 (Reading the Tire Size)

Average Customer Rating

For All Vehicles (4)
7.4  
Filter

Filtering Options

(For Best Results, Sort One Option at a Time.)
(Numbers in parentheses represent the total number of reviews available for that sort.)
Sort

Sort Reviews

Reviews of this Tire for All Vehicles

(4 Total Reviews)
Rating
8.3  
Review Date
January 02, 2013
Vehicle
2005 HONDA ACCORD HYBRID
Location
ELYRIA, OH
Driving Conditions
Mostly Dry
Driving Style
Mixed Highway and City
Owned Tires for
6 months
Miles Driven on Tires
7000
Ride Comfort
9.0  
Cornering/Steering
8.0  
Ride Noise
7.0  
Tread Life
9.0  
Dry Traction
9.0  
Wet Traction
8.0  
Winter Traction N/A
Buy Tire Again Likely

Tire Pros

None Provided

Tire Cons

None Provided

Overall I have been pleased with the tires and the process of buying the tires from you service

207 of 375 people found this review helpful

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
Rating
7.0  
Review Date
January 25, 2012
Vehicle
2005 TOYOTA CAMRY SE/XLE
Location
RIO RANCHO, NM
Driving Conditions
Mostly Dry
Driving Style
Mixed Highway and City
Owned Tires for
10 months
Miles Driven on Tires
6420
Ride Comfort
5.0  
Cornering/Steering
9.0  
Ride Noise
8.0  
Tread Life
7.0  
Dry Traction
9.0  
Wet Traction
8.0  
Winter Traction N/A
Buy Tire Again Not Likely

Tire Pros

Seems to be a good handling tire. No problems with loss of traction.

Tire Cons

Won't stay balanced. MPG drop Conflicting info on if they are LLR or not.

Purchased these after researching online. When I looked, another major tire site had them listed as LLR tires with a special silicone blend to increase mpg. Month or so after purchase they are no longer listed as LLR, but still say they have special mpg compounds on the Yoko site. Actually lost 1.5 mpg (corrected and calculated). Have to run higher pressure in them to get decent mpg (corrected and calculated accurate). BIGGEST PROBLEM: Continuously going out of balance at 65 to 70 range. Very annoying. Will look elsewhere when these are shot.

253 of 462 people found this review helpful

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
Rating
9.0  
Review Date
December 11, 2013
Vehicle
2001 FORD TAURUS SES/SEL
Location
LILBURN, GA
Driving Conditions
Mixed Dry Rain
Driving Style
Mixed Highway and City
Owned Tires for
6 months
Miles Driven on Tires
8000
Ride Comfort
8.0  
Cornering/Steering
9.0  
Ride Noise
8.0  
Tread Life N/A
Dry Traction
10.0  
Wet Traction
10.0  
Winter Traction N/A
Buy Tire Again Yes

Tire Pros

None Provided

Tire Cons

None Provided

So far tires have exceeds expectations

201 of 382 people found this review helpful

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
Rating
5.3  
Review Date
March 24, 2015
Vehicle
2007 TOYOTA CAMRY CE/LE/XLE
Location
Wexford, PA
Driving Conditions
Mixed Dry Rain
Driving Style
Mixed Highway and City
Owned Tires for
1 year 8 months
Miles Driven on Tires
12000
Ride Comfort
7.0  
Cornering/Steering
7.0  
Ride Noise
7.0  
Tread Life
1.0  
Dry Traction
7.0  
Wet Traction
3.0  
Winter Traction
1.0  
Buy Tire Again No

Tire Pros

NOTHING, last Yokohamas were great these did not last and were 96/each - rip off

Tire Cons

Tires wore out in less than 12K miles of use. THEY SUCK.

Purchased tires July 2013, and by the winter of 2014 - realized they are completely gone. Toast after 12-15K miles really ??? DO NOT BUY.

18 of 37 people found this review helpful

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
Nevermind

Thank you for taking the time to notify us of an inappropriate review.

Our trusted experts will evaluate this review and take the proper actions.